THE OLD COVENANT IS OBSOLETE AND NO LONGER APPLIES
According to the teachings of the Lord Jesus and New Testament writings, the Old Covenant has been superseded by the New Covenant.
.
If you want to delve into this topic deeply in order to remove any possible cloudy thinking on the subject, the Epistle to the Hebrews will give you a good start and likely answer most or all of your questions. That monumental treatise was written in the early 60s AD by Hebrew followers of the Lord Jesus to their fellow Hebrews in a concerted effort to teach the principles of the New Covenant and how it surpassed the Old Covenant.
The following seven Scriptural passages from Hebrews provide a good starter kit to gain the basic elementary facts of the topic and put to rest any objections against this truth as well as jettison the false assertions that certain Old Covenant legalities remain in effect which attempt to subvert the ratification of the New Covenant, hinder the spiritual freedom thereof, and claim benefits which have no legal standing:
THE NEW COVENANT OF MESSIAH JESUS
ONE:
Now if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron? For when the priesthood is changed, of necessity there takes place a change of law also. For the one concerning whom these things are spoken belongs to another tribe, from which no one has officiated at the altar. For it is evident that our Lord was descended from Judah, a tribe with reference to which Moses spoke nothing concerning priests. And this is clearer still, if another priest arises according to the likeness of Melchizedek, who has become such not on the basis of a law of physical requirement, but according to the power of an indestructible life. For it is attested of Him,
“You are a priest forever
According to the order of Melchizedek.” [Hebrews 7:11-17]
TWO:
For, on the one hand, there is a setting aside of a former commandment because of its weakness and uselessness (for the Law made nothing perfect), and on the other hand there is a bringing in of a better hope, through which we draw near to God. And inasmuch as it was not without an oath (for they indeed became priests without an oath, but He with an oath through the One who said to Him,
“The Lord has sworn
And will not change His mind,
‘You are a priest forever’”);
So much the more also Jesus has become the guarantee of a better covenant. [Hebrews 7:18-22]
THREE:
But now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, by as much as He is also the mediator of a better covenant, which has been enacted on better promises. For if that first covenant had been faultless, there would have been no occasion sought for a second. For finding fault with them, He says,
“Behold, days are coming, says the Lord,
When I will effect a new covenant
With the house of Israel and with the house of Judah;
Not like the covenant which I made with their fathers
On the day when I took them by the hand
To lead them out of the land of Egypt;
For they did not continue in My covenant,
And I did not care for them, says the Lord.
For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel
After those days, says the Lord:
I will put My laws into their minds,
And I will write them on their hearts.
And I will be their God,
And they shall be My people.
And they shall not teach everyone his fellow citizen,
And everyone his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’
For all will know Me,
From the least to the greatest of them.
For I will be merciful to their iniquities,
And I will remember their sins no more.”
When He said, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to disappear. [Hebrews 8:6-13]
FOUR:
For this reason He is the mediator of a new covenant, so that, since a death has taken place for the redemption of the transgressions that were committed under the first covenant, those who have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance. For where a covenant is, there must of necessity be the death of the one who made it. For a covenant is valid only when men are dead, for it is never in force while the one who made it lives. Therefore even the first covenant was not inaugurated without blood. [Hebrews 9:15-18]
FIVE:
After saying above, “Sacrifices and offerings and whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin You have not desired, nor have You taken pleasure in them” (which are offered according to the Law), then He said, “Behold, I have come to do Your will.” He takes away the first in order to establish the second. By this will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.
Every priest stands daily ministering and offering time after time the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins; but He, having offered one sacrifice for sins for all time, sat down at the right hand of God, waiting from that time onward until His enemies be made a footstool for His feet. For by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are sanctified. And the Holy Spirit also testifies to us; for after saying,
“This is the covenant that I will make with them
After those days, says the Lord:
I will put My laws upon their heart,
And on their mind I will write them,”
He then says,
“And their sins and their lawless deeds
I will remember no more.”
Now where there is forgiveness of these things, there is no longer any offering for sin.
Therefore, brethren, since we have confidence to enter the holy place by the blood of Jesus, by a new and living way which He inaugurated for us through the veil, that is, His flesh, and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near with a sincere heart in full assurance of faith, having our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water. Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful; and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near. [Hebrews 10:8-25]
SIX:
But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to myriads of angels, to the general assembly and church of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God, the Judge of all, and to the spirits of the righteous made perfect, and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood, which speaks better than the blood of Abel. [Hebrews 12:22-24]
SEVEN:
Now the God of peace, who brought up from the dead the great Shepherd of the sheep through the blood of the eternal covenant, even Jesus our Lord, equip you in every good thing to do His will, working in us that which is pleasing in His sight, through Jesus Christ, to whom be the glory forever and ever. Amen. [Hebrews 13:20-21][1]
© 2023 by RJ Dawson. All Rights Reserved.
[1] Unless otherwise noted all Scriptures are taken from the New American Standard Bible, © 1960, 1963, 1968, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1975, 1977, 1995 by The Lockman Foundation. Used by permission.
Posted on November 1, 2023, in Teaching and tagged Blood Covenant, Hebrews, Law of Moses, Lord Jesus, Melchizedek, New Covenant Teachings of Jesus, Old Covenant, Old Testament, Real Christianity The Nature of the Church, Salvation, The Great Awakening, The New Covenant, The New Testament, The Sacrifice Lamb, Tribe of Judah. Bookmark the permalink. 13 Comments.



Jesus said He didn’t come to abolish the law and the prophets but to fulfill them. (Matthew 5: 17-20)
LikeLike
Yes. Exactly. Thanks Susan. Here is the actual passage:
“Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or stroke shall pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Whoever then annuls one of the least of these commandments, and teaches others to do the same, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever keeps and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say to you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven.” [Matthew 5:17-20]
The Lord is making an extremely important point here which portends several necessary deductions. First of all, though, He is stating categorically that the righteousness of the Pharisees is deficient and will not result in one entering the kingdom of heaven. It means their interpretation and application of the Law was incorrect. Second, the Hebrew Scriptures were originally divided into three sections: The Law, the Prophets, and the Writings. Two of these are mentioned here with the possible implication of the third which would indicate the fullness of OT Scripture. The Writings contained the Psalms, for example, and the Psalms contained many prophecies about the Lord.
There were those at that time who may have thought, due to what was perceived as the Lord’s apparent departure from the traditional understanding and interpretation of the Scriptures, that He was somehow discounting the Law and Prophets. This was otherwise obviously not the case. In fact, the OT Scriptures pointed to Him repeatedly and voluminously, and He continued to point out all the passages revealing His identity and mission, and that He fulfilled them all and was the only One who did.
The word “fulfill” is from the Greek root πληρόω plēróō (play-ro’-o). It is defined by Strong’s as “to make replete, i.e. (literally) to cram (a net), level up (a hollow), or (figuratively) to furnish (or imbue, diffuse, influence), satisfy, execute (an office), finish (a period or task), verify (or coincide with a prediction), etc.:—accomplish, × after, (be) complete, end, expire, fill (up), fulfil, (be, make) full (come), fully preach, perfect, supply.”
Regarding its use in Matthew 5:17 we gain a deeper lexicon rendering as follows: “Universally and absolutely, to fulfil, i.e. “to cause God’s will (as made known in the law) to be obeyed as it should be, and God’s promises (given through the prophets) to receive fulfilment.”
Therefore, the Lord Jesus states that He is for the Law, that He stands by the Law and all the commandments, legal renderings, and definitions of sin thereof, that the Law is perfect as originally given, that it was actually authored by Him through Moses, that it reveals His will, and that He, in and by His perfect life, was in the process of keeping it perfectly and would continue this process until the end when He stated from the cross right before death that “It is finished!” Of course, no one had ever “kept” the Law of Moses perfectly until He did. He obeyed God’s will perfectly, “as it should be,” and fulfilled all the promises and prophecies. As we see in the preceding full definition, He absolutely fulfilled both the Law and Prophets.
Therefore, His fulfillment also clearly indicated a termination of the Old Covenant. It was both the end of the Old Covenant and the beginning of the New Covenant. The Old Covenant remained in effect until He fulfilled it. The apostle Paul was likely the best authority on this at the time and he stated:
For there is no partiality with God. For all who have sinned without the Law will also perish without the Law, and all who have sinned under the Law will be judged by the Law; for it is not the hearers of the Law who are just before God, but the doers of the Law will be justified. For when Gentiles who do not have the Law do instinctively the things of the Law, these, not having the Law, are a law to themselves, in that they show the work of the Law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness and their thoughts alternately accusing or else defending them, on the day when, according to my gospel, God will judge the secrets of men through Christ Jesus.
But if you bear the name “Jew” [Ἰουδαῖος Ioudaîos (ee-oo-dah’-yos)] and rely upon the Law and boast in God, and know His will and approve the things that are essential, being instructed out of the Law, and are confident that you yourself are a guide to the blind, a light to those who are in darkness, a corrector of the foolish, a teacher of the immature, having in the Law the embodiment of knowledge and of the truth, you, therefore, who teach another, do you not teach yourself? You who preach that one shall not steal, do you steal? You who say that one should not commit adultery, do you commit adultery? You who abhor idols, do you rob temples? You who boast in the Law, through your breaking the Law, do you dishonor God? For “the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you,” just as it is written.
For indeed circumcision is of value if you practice the Law; but if you are a transgressor of the Law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. So if the uncircumcised man keeps the requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision? And he who is physically uncircumcised, if he keeps the Law, will he not judge you who though having the letter of the Law and circumcision are a transgressor of the Law? For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh. But he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that which is of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter; and his praise is not from men, but from God. [Romans 2:11-29]
This Gentile keeping or doing of the Law which Paul referred to was obviously not recognized by the traditional Hebrew teachers of the Law and clearly indicated that something new had transpired—a New Covenant—and based on the many references in the New Testament Scriptures and primarily for my purposes here, in the Book of Hebrews, the Old Covenant after being fulfilled was no longer in effect and had truly become obsolete:
When He said, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. But whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to disappear. [Hebrews 8:13]
The Book of Hebrews was written in the early 60s AD, only a short time before the terminal events of 70AD. It was toward the end of the time which began with the Lord’s death and resurrection when “whatever is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to disappear.”
Blessings
LikeLiked by 2 people
Galatians 6: 14-16 also talks about the only thing that counts — the “New Creation”, which is, I think, a focus often overlooked in the church.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. Thanks. It is a new Creation. And Paul’s letter to the Galatians was another in which the main topic was the creation and application of the New Covenant as opposed to the Old in which he explains where he was before in serving the Old but later broke away in service to the New. It was a clear distinction such that Paul’s Hebrew enemies had actually succeeded in corrupting many of his Galatian converts by teaching and reinstituting facets of the Old which they believed incorrectly to be mandatory. He was quite angry about this and rightfully so. The New Covenant is a Blood Covenant in which both covenant partners must die and be born again to new life. The Lord fulfilled this literally, of course. It is why Paul stated he would never boast except in the cross. The circumcision in the flesh represents the Old Covenant. The circumcision of the heart represents the New Covenant which is a New Creation.
LikeLiked by 3 people
thank you RJ!
Another verse, “By abolishing in His flesh the law of commandments and ordinances, He created in Himself the one new man in place of the two…reconciling both to God in the One Body through the Cross…for through Him we both have access in One Spirit to the Father…saints…members of the Household of God…joined together and grow into a holy temple in the Lord…a dwelling place for God in the Spirit” Ephesians 2:15-22
The Cross of Jesus changed everything but most people clearly haven’t gotten the message yet!
I sincerely hope that every person starts reading the Word of God for themselves so” the Living Abiding Word of God” can be alive in all, when we spend our time with the One our soul loves, Jesus the Word made flesh, pondering, reflecting on, muttering, speaking and singing the Words out loud, meditating on the Words in the night and the day, chewing the meat so we can digest and become what we eat consistently, drinking of the Pure Water of the Word of Life, drinking of the abundance of grace and glory of Christ, coming to know and be the new creation in Christ.
I still love these seven Words of Jesus that are my new foundation, “Abide in Me, and I in you.” The first Words resurrection Jesus said to me personally were, “Come to Me you who are weary and heavy-laden with burdens, and I will give you rest” and I did and now all my soul wants to do is sing His Praises, sing of His manifest Glory, sing of His works and His finished work of the Cross that truly changed everything in my life.
LikeLike
Thank you, Yvonne. I love your witness and testimony. These words of yours are truly heartfelt. Thanks also for the excellent choices of Scripture which dovetail very well with the other passages offered here. The Lord’s great sacrifice on the cross, the greatest expression of pure love of all time which makes salvation and reconciliation with Him possible, makes all the difference. Blessings to you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have had to read this article a couple of times RJ. Your teachings really make me think. It is a learning process that we never fully complete in our own lifetimes.
When they speak of a priest back around Moses’ time, where you wrote a priest like Melchizedek, what exactly is a priest? Were there many priests then who taught the people before it was written in their hearts? Were they chosen by God then?
So this takes me to today. What does the word priest actually mean today? When I talk about a person’s sermon that I may have just listened to, with another person, I find myself saying, “I just listened to this Priest or Pastor, or whatever he is.” There are so many names now, deacons, priest, pastor, minister. Are they all called to teach?
These lines struck me today reading this: “And they shall not teach everyone his fellow citizen, And everyone his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ For all will know Me.”
Just as I feel His new covenant in my heart and mind now, I still need help with learning His words, that which you do for me in your writings. But all these different people who are teaching so many different things, none of which seem to make sense, as there are so many rules to belong to a church these days. When I only belong to our Father who makes things so much easier then what a church does. Does that make sense?
I just learned this past week about preachers at the Lutheran churches. My sister used to work at her Lutheran church. She told me that their ministers, (see, I am not sure what a Lutherans leader is called), can only preach at a church for 5 years and then they have to move to another one. I asked why and I was surprised at her answer, mainly so they do not become too attached to folks, like get too involved with others, relationships. I am sure there is more to it than that.
I better quit now, I have more questions, but I will save them for the next article. Thank you RJ.
LikeLike
Thank you Sandra. These are great questions and observances. First of all, let’s address Melchizedek, the mysterious priest of Old Testament lore during the early time of Abraham, the first Hebrew (1946-1771BC). Melchizedek is only mentioned twice in the OT, in Genesis 14:18 and Psalm 110:4, and eight times in the NT, all in the Book of Hebrews. He is mentioned first after Abram’s war with the kings and rescue mission. This is when Abraham met him for the first and only time in Scripture. The location of their meeting was known at that time as the valley of Shaveh, also known as the King’s Valley: “And Melchizedek king of Salem brought out bread and wine; now he was a priest of God Most High (El-Elyon).”
Based on my research, this meeting took place close by the Gihon Spring in what later came to be known as the Kidron Valley (the brook Kidron) which was just below the future location of Jerusalem to the immediate west. This valley was a deep rocky-bottom ravine with a pure flowing brook likely fed by the spring. Over time the lower sections of this ravine gradually filled in with silt though it remained a relatively deep gorge in the time of the Lord and even at present though not to the same extent (there has been much more silting since the Lord’s time)
The location is important. It was on the border between the land of the tribe of Judah to the east and the tribe of Benjamin to the west (where Jerusalem would be located). Judah and Benjamin would be among Abraham’s twelve great-grandsons and progenitors of the future twelve tribes. Some believe this priest Melchizedek to be the Lord Himself ministering from what would be the Judah side of the brook in the land of His future birth. Judah would be the tribe of the “ruling scepter” or the King’s tribe (King’s Valley). One must note that Abram gave tithes of all to Melchizedek, the “King of Salem,” hence the name: Melchi (King) Zedek: (Salem: “righteousness”/“peace”). Right after this meeting and Abram’s gift, in the next chapter, we see that God would greatly bless Abram with his own miracle child (Isaac) and innumerable descendants.
Regarding the priesthood Melchizedek belonged to, it was eternal and this Man was said to be: Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually [Hebrews 7:3]. The Book of Hebrews goes to great lengths explaining this further and requires more study.
Now, regarding the next priesthood of the Hebrews, it came centuries later through the Law of Moses, who lived from 1526-1406BC. Moses was born 420 years after Abraham was born and 245 years after Abraham died. Moses received the Law after the Exodus from Egypt. In this Law, the tribe of Levi (another of the twelve great-grandsons of Abraham) would the “priestly” tribe. One had to be a member of this tribe, a Levite, to be a priest. The very first priest was Aaron the brother of Moses. Among these priests was the (one at a time) high priest. These priests served within the sacrifice structure of the Tabernacle (tent) in the wilderness that centuries later became the first Temple in Solomon’s time. The high priests and all the other priests served from the time of Moses until the end of the nation of Israel in 70AD when the last Temple was destroyed (there was no longer any need for it). The Lord Jesus became the only High Priest forever as the eternal priesthood of Melchizedek. He also became the Sacrifice Lamb offering Himself as a one time and only time payment for our sins.
Regarding the titles of ministers in the New Testament Community founded by the Lord, they essentially did not exist the way they did later on. Christians were not known by titles or necessarily addressed by titles but simply by their given names. Such were not titled positions of status. Even the Lord Himself is most often addressed only by His Name in the Gospels, though respectfully. He was known primarily as a Rabbi (Teacher). This study is very involved and detailed and is essentially a book-length subject. I have written extensively on it. Suffice it to say that the New Testament mentions several general places of service referred to as elders, overseers, deacons, ministers, shepherds, stewards, etc. Again, these were not entitled positions but merely indicated the type or service one was called to and engaged in. Not all were called to teach. However, the Book of Revelation says that all believers are priests in that we are a kingdom of priests, which signify service to the Lord’s overall New Covenant ministry.
Each Christian denomination treats such titles differently, designates some with greater importance, and even makes up many of their own. It IS confusing, not because of what the New Testament says but due to what some later Christians created. It is why I have done so much research on the subject. Look at it this way: When people addressed the apostle Paul they didn’t exclusively say “Hello Apostle Paul,” but simply referred to him by his name though with honor for his place of service in the Lord, which was primarily as an apostle (but also as a teacher and preacher).
The best way to simplify all this and make it more understandable is to put the New Testament first. We must read it and study it. In this way we discover the way they did things in the beginning as the Lord Jesus taught them. By doing this we discover that generations of Christians have later added their own man-made non-New Testament stuff for ulterior reasons and their own agendas. We are forced to sort through this stuff somewhat in learning the truth of Scripture, but knowing what the New Testament says is extremely important. It’s how we tell truth from error.
Blessings to you, Sandra
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks so much for this explanation. It makes so much sense. I appreciate your teachings. Thank you RJ.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m having trouble commenting on your site, so I’ll take this path instead. I just wanted you to know that I’m catching up. Scanned this article today and realized I’ll have to save it for when I have more time in which to digest your always excellent research 🙂 It’s been a busy and difficult couple of weeks. Your prayers would be greatly appreciated
LikeLike
Thanks Linda. I’m not sure what the problem may be. Are you receiving my posts okay? Your comment yesterday showed up on my site as “anonymous.” I posted it yesterday to my post The Real Chosen People (Part 2) and replied to it. Please tell me if it registered on your site and you received my reply. I will certainly pray for you. Thank you for support and the kind words, especially since your time is limited. Have a great day. Blessings
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I’m receiving your posts, and I see my comment finally appeared. It just takes a very long time 🙂
LikeLike
Great. Thank you Linda. Good news. I hope other readers aren’t having the same problem. My traffic has been down considerably lately.
LikeLiked by 1 person